By Wisdom Mdzungairi
The year 2012 was a turbulent one, as might be expected from
a Year of the Dragon.
However, while the run-up to the Chinese leadership
transition was nothing if not controversial, President Hu Jintao and Premier
Wen Jiabao’s passing of the baton to Xi Jinping and Li Keqian was done
smoothly.
The Xi-Li government is unlikely to signal any dramatic
changes for China-Africa relations. Xi met frequently with African leaders
during Hu’s presidency and therefore has a firm grasp of the relevant issues.
Yet closer to home, this year’s much-delayed harmonised
elections in Zimbabwe could well yield surprises, but the public and corporate
citizens are nervous about election tactics such as “indigenisation decrees”.
Some believe that if President Robert Mugabe could rein in
his over-enthusiastic, vociferous henchmen in the police and security forces,
the ensuing free and fair elections would be his to win.
Whatever the conclusions, the West’s “smart sanctions” have
failed to bring about the intended changes politically, and have provided the
elite few with a scapegoat for disastrous economic mismanagement and corruption
in the mining industry.
China and India have, however, voiced concern about the
security of investment under the unpredictable empowerment and indigenisation
programme, along with Zimbabwe’s failure to renew its political leadership.
Whatever the result, whatever the circumstances, as Sadc
countries await the constitution referendum and national elections, there will
be little or no change at all! It is simply a test for the constitutions.
Following sanctions imposed on the political elite, Zimbabwe
has “Looked East” for economic sanctuary, and China has embraced the gesture
with both hands making inroads into the country’s promising economic sector.
From Beijing’s perspective, the current platform for
promoting China’s relations with Africa – the Ministerial Forum on China-Africa
Co-operation (FOCAC) – a legacy of former Chinese President Jiang Zemin, is
working well.
So far all the indications are that China’s new leadership
team is prioritising internal economic and financial reforms.
On Saturday Chinese welcomed the arrival of the Year of the
Snake with raucous celebrations, setting off a cacophony of firecrackers in the
streets and sending fireworks blazing into the sky to bring good fortune.
Celebrations continued into the early hours of yesterday,
officially the first day of the Lunar New Year, but as far as China’s relations
with Africa in general, and in particular Zimbabwe go, it seems to be business
as usual. Trade is expected to rise even higher in China’s favour.
For the uninitiated, the origin of Chinese New Year is
itself centuries old and gains significance because of several myths and
traditions. Traditionally, the festival was a time to honour deities as well as
ancestors.
Although fears of a Chinese “hard landing” have subsided, it
appears that Beijing’s long-held efforts to move from an investment-led to
consumer-driven growth model are just now beginning in earnest.
Such a shift may have a significant impact on Zimbabwe’s relations with China, hurting especially those other countries that take commodity demand for granted.
Such a shift may have a significant impact on Zimbabwe’s relations with China, hurting especially those other countries that take commodity demand for granted.
Cheap and poor standard goods will continue to flood the local
markets since there are no checking mechanisms to turn the tide as China
continues to export mostly finished products to Africa.
It is no coincidence then that Africa is China’s
second-largest overseas contract market. For instance, between January and
October 2012, Chinese enterprises’ newly-signed deals in Africa amounted to
almost $40 billion, a 28% year-on-year increase, and those deals accounted for
one-third of China’s contracted projects in foreign countries.
Political capital and history remained important factors in
China’s relations with Africa. Symbolic is the African Union (AU)new
headquarters in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Built with Beijing’s funds and
inaugurated in January 2012 by African leaders, it is concrete evidence to
China’s declared support for African integration.
Sadly, it is also a stinging reminder that the AU is funded
97% by foreign nations, as disclosed by AU chairperson Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma
recently.
This, obviously, contributes to lack of ownership of the AU
– a major concern by member states and their Non-Aligned Movement members.
African leaders have described the trade relations tilt in China’s favour as
“unsustainable”.
But the bone of contention is how to deal with the matter.
Watching the Chinese celebrate the Year of the Snake on Saturday –one would have thought that Africa could have learnt a thing or two, and that perhaps this time around African leaders should be determined to do things differently.
Watching the Chinese celebrate the Year of the Snake on Saturday –one would have thought that Africa could have learnt a thing or two, and that perhaps this time around African leaders should be determined to do things differently.
The Chinese will continue to look for cheaper assets —
should they get them on a silver plate? Potential investors doubtful of
Zimbabwe’s good faith will continue to monitor events in the country, but will
not waste time when more investor-friendly countries are available.
And so Zimbabwe’s tendency to over-estimate its mineral
resource, its negotiating skills and its development expertise may put off
potential investors.
2013 is a year Zimbabwe has a greater chance to rebrand
itself through the United Nations World Tourism Organisation General Assembly
sometime in August, a test for the constitutions and perhaps harmonised
elections.
Why doesn’t she do things differently this time around, given the support she has from neighbours, the continent and others? Does she really need to be perpetually under siege from “politics going wrong” –all the time?
Why doesn’t she do things differently this time around, given the support she has from neighbours, the continent and others? Does she really need to be perpetually under siege from “politics going wrong” –all the time?
millenniumzimbabwe@yahoo.com/twitter.com/wisdomdzungairi
3 Responses to Year of the Snake 2013
click the following
webpage February 12, 2013 at 8:56 am #
I’m not sure where you’re getting your info, however great
topic. I needs to spend a while learning much more or figuring out more. Thanks
for fantastic information I was searching for this information for my mission.|
Gutter Poet February 12, 2013 at 11:26 am #
This is very good, many thanks for the post. If only our
political class would pluck a leaf from the way the Chinese are doing business
then we could be on our way out of poverty in a very few short years! It is
being tauted that the chinese are moving upwards of 20 million people out of
poverty every year and this rate is accelarating..the breakneck development
thrust that started on the coastal cities is moving inland at lightning speed.
Granted China sits at number 83 in terms of income per capita, it would not be
surprising if it found itself in the top 20 in the next decade.
Zimbabwe is a tiny country with massive potential but it
lacks one vital ingredient to be the success story it should be: MANAGEMENT.
Most management theorists are in agreement that 92% of all company failures is
caused by poor MANAGEMENT, the same applies with nations.
http://swiftpaydayloansonline.co.uk
March 1, 2013 at 7:16 pm #
If some one wants expert view about blogging and
site-building after that i recommend him/her to pay a quick visit this web
site, Keep up the good work.|
No comments:
Post a Comment